Database
 

Thresholds Database > Tropical forest fires - frequency and intensity; Amazonia and South-East Asia

Certainty of shift: Proposed
Location: South-East Asia, Indonesia, South America, Amazonia
System Type: Social-Ecological
Regime Shift Category: 3a
Ecosystem Type
Forest/Woodland
Spatial Scale
Landscape/Local
Type of Resource Use
Forestry
Number of Possible Regimes
2
Ecosystem Service
Provision of food, fuel and fire
Time Scale of Change
Years
Resource Users
Logging companies and local farmers 
Reversibility of Shift
Irreversible

Background

Fires in tropical forests with closed canopies tend to occur infrequently (hundreds of years) and with low intensity (Goldammer 1990). With increased logging, forest fires in Amazonia and southeast Asia now occur more frequently and with greater intensity (Cochrane 1999; Stolle 2004).

Alternate Regimes

1. Closed canopy tropical rainforest with infrequent, low intensity fires.

2. Fragmented forest, open canopies and frequent high intensity fires. Can possibly lead to scrub or savanna.

Fast or Dependent Variable(s)
Fire intensity and frequency, density of canopy, forest micro-climate
Slow or Independent Variable(s)
Slow: forest fragmentation, degree of canopy opening, density of regrowth; slowest: climate
Disturbance or Threshold Trigger(s)
Logging, road building, agriculture, agricultural burning
External / Internal Trigger
External

Mechanism

Logging and associated road building opens up the forest canopy, with some forest being converted to agricultural land. The forest becomes fragmented, increasing edge effects and susceptibility to fires (through microclimate changes and biomass dieback) (Cochrane 2001). The frequency of fires can increase in this remaining forest, through burning for pasture in agricultural land. High intensity fires are more likely in drier years (Stolle 2004).



A positivefeedback loop is set up, where repeated fires lead to further deforestation and fragmentation, which then lead to more fires (Cochrane 1999). The probability of a fire is greater after a first burn because dieback and regrowth cause fuel loads to increase, providing fuel for subsequent higher intensity fires.



There appears to be a threshold of canopy opening, at which the landscape undergoes rapid fire-driven change towards a new state, with the original forest largely disappearing (du Toit et al. 2004).

Management Decisions in Each Regime

Contact
Jacqui Meyers

Email
jacqui.meyers@csiro.au

CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems,
PO Box 284,
Canberra ACT 2601

Keywords
adaptive management, empirical data, tropics, forests, thresholds, resilience, land-use, fire, Indonesia, Tanzania, Africa, Zimbabwe, fire, forest, deforestation, Amazon, Brazil, clearing, rainforest, empirical data

References

Goldammer, J. G. 1990. Fire in the Tropical Biota. Berlin: Springer.

Cochrane, M. A. 2001. Synergistic Interactions Between Habitat Fragmentation and Fire in Evergreen Tropical Forests. Conservation Biology 15, no. 6: 1515-21. (E)

Cochrane, M. A., A. Alencar, M. D. Schulze, C. M. Souza, D. C. Nepstad, P. Lefebvre, and E. A. Davidson. 1999. Positive Feedbacks in the Fire Dynamic of Closed Canopy Tropical Forests. Science 284: 1832-35.

Du Toit, J. T., B. H. Walker, and B. M. Campbell. 2004. Conserving Tropical Nature: Current Challenges for Ecologists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19, no. 1: 12-17. (C)

Stolle, F., K. M. Chomitz, E. F. Lambin, and T. P. Tomich. 2003. Land Use and Vegetation Fires in Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia. Forest Ecology and Management 179, no. 1-3: 277-92. (E)